The True Value of Beef to Ontario's Economy
Ontario's beef industry is characterized by diverse primary production
systems, a variety of end product specifications, and a host of
wholesale and retail market segments. No wonder industry wide consensus
on most topics is difficult to achieve! But one thing that all participants
can agree on is that our beef industry is very important to the
provincial economy. But how can we best measure that value?
Traditionally, the economic value of agricultural sectors has been
equated to their total farm gate sales. For beef in Ontario, that
figure has averaged an impressive one billion dollars
annually for calf and cattle and sales, for a number of years. However,
we know that the beef industry extends well beyond the farm gate
- to slaughter plants, further processing, distribution and retailing.
When all of these parts of the supply chain are counted in, the
total value of sales increases dramatically, to about 13
billion dollars per year! (Table 1).
And the number of jobs which are directly related to beef production,
processing and retailing are equally impressive
Primary production | 11,000 |
Processing | 8,000 |
Retail | 42,000 |
Total | 61,000 jobs |
Wow - over 60,000 people are employed in raising beef animals, carcass fabrication and further processing, and getting the product into the hands of the end user! (Table 3). And these jobs not only represent economic value, but also social value. Farmers typically rate their job satisfaction as very high - they love what they do. Beef farm families are strong participants in the rural community infrastructure, and create jobs in local towns in the service and supply sectors. Processing and retailing jobs are concentrated in cities, amplifying the impact of beef farming on employment well beyond the farm. The transportation industry also benefits from domestic beef production, as cattle are typically trucked several times between pasture and packer, and the distribution of products to wholesalers, retail chains and food service locations keeps drivers on the go.
However, simply using revenue or jobs by themselves is not the best way to evaluate an industry's overall economic contribution. According to OMAFRA Senior Economist Steve Duff, there is a more accurate way to determine the true contribution an industry makes to our fiscal well-being - Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Gross Domestic Product is a superior method, in part because it is based on the sum of the economic value added at each step in the supply chain. This total value added is made up of direct, indirect and induced effects. Direct effects include the increase in value of an animal being fed home grown feeds - what our beef farm operations excel at - and is the base of the value chain. The industry also purchases materials and services from supplier firms, who in turn make further purchases from their suppliers. These contribute to the indirect effects on GDP. As well, people employed in the industry and in firms supplying related services earn incomes, part of which they spend on consuming goods and services - this contributes to the induced effect on GDP.
Beyond the Dollars The non-economic benefits of beef farming also have to be recognized. Beef farms grow large amounts of soil building forages, which replenish organic matter in crop rotations and stabilize fragile erodible soil in permanent stands. Beef pasture lands provide nesting habitat for grassland bird species and other ecosystem services. And in the case of shallow soils or steep slopes, permanent pasture creates the means to produce a high quality protein source for humans from land which is not capable of human edible crop production. Against the back drop of steadily increasing world population, shrinking global supply of arable land and environmental degradation, these are attributes which should not be taken lightly. |
The annual contribution of beef to Ontario's GDP averages $2.70
billion (Table 2), a significant part of the powerful agricultural
economic engine which is an important driver of the province's economy.
Maintaining this amount is key to the province's well-being. If
production is lost from the province (for example, replacing homegrown
feeder cattle with more western imports, or fed cattle slaughter
with boxed beef from the US), our economy undergoes a significant
setback. Jobs are lost and GDP goes down.
But the converse is also true - increasing the provincial production
of calves, and thus increasing the total number of cattle on feed
and the total number of head flowing through our packing plants
with 'born in Ontario' animals should pay big dividends. It would
allow Ontario to fully accrue the benefits of a re-tooled and vibrant
beef sector by capturing all of the new added value at the cow-calf
level and most of the added value at the feedlot level; since currently
idle feedlot capacity would be brought back into production, without
displacing current feedlot activity. As well, there is underutilized
capacity in Ontario's processing sector, and a strong demand on
these plants to produce more product. So if the increased feedlot
output was absorbed by processing plants and was added to their
current output, the province would benefit from the high marginal
value added at that level as well.
But It all starts with the cow herd - those ladies are the foundation
of any sustainable beef industry!
Table 1. Ontario Agriculture Total Sales Revenue from Primary, Processing
and Retail, by Commodity, Adjusted for Product Imports
. ($Cdn Billion)*
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 5 Yr Avg | |
Grains & Oilseed | 25.83 | 30.85 | 31.39 | 34.54 | 36.27 |
31.77
|
Potato | 0.90 | 1.12 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.15 |
1.15
|
Greenhouse Vegetables | 6.23 | 6.53 | 7.82 | 8.32 | 8.28 |
7.44
|
Field Vegetables | 5.99 | 5.83 | 6.34 | 6.37 | 6.38 |
6.18
|
Fruits | 2.99 | 2.87 | 2.79 | 2.59 | 2.60 |
2.77
|
Nursery & Floriculture | 8.32 | 7.71 | 8.98 | 8.53 | 8.23 |
8.36
|
Maple | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.33 |
0.22
|
Tobacco | 0.66 | 0.50 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.54 |
0.58
|
Cattle | 12.46 | 13.62 | 12.36 | 13.10 | 13.21 |
12.95
|
Hogs | 11.27 | 10.64 | 9.84 | 10.40 | 12.06 |
10.84
|
Sheep | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.77 |
0.69
|
Dairy | 22.70 | 22.28 | 23.61 | 23.57 | 23.88 |
23.21
|
Poultry & Eggs | 12.59 | 13.66 | 14.57 | 13.99 | 14.71 |
13.90
|
Honey | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.22 |
0.15
|
Other Domestic | 4.64 | 4.74 | 4.84 | 5.42 | 4.90 |
4.91
|
Total Domestic | 115.42 | 121.23 | 125.50 | 129.92 | 133.54 |
125.12
|
Other Sourcing | 17.27 | 18.66 | 19.41 | 19.48 | 21.06 |
19.18
|
Beverages | 4.05 | 3.96 | 4.05 | 4.02 | 3.96 |
4.01
|
Total | 136.73 | 143.85 | 148.96 | 153.41 | 158.56 |
148.30
|
*Adapted from James, Staciwa and Duff. 2013. A Statistic for Ontario
Agri-Food Contribution by Primary Sector.
OMAFRA.
Table 2. Ontario Gross Domestic Product from Primary, Processing and Retail Sectors by Agricultural Commodity, Adjusted for Product Imports ($Cdn Billion)*
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 6 Yr. Avg. | |
Grains & Oilseed | 6.72 | 7.68 | 7.53 | 8.09 | 8.14 | 8.68 |
7.81
|
Potato | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.3 | 0.25 | 0.22 |
0.27
|
Greenhouse Vegetables | 1.67 | 1.71 | 1.9 | 1.96 | 1.88 | 1.76 |
1.81
|
Field Vegetables | 1.56 | 1.48 | 1.51 | 1.46 | 1.38 | 1.35 |
1.46
|
Fruits | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.46 |
0.63
|
Nursery & Floriculture | 1.99 | 1.8 | 1.94 | 1.81 | 1.72 | 1.66 |
1.82
|
Maple | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
0.05
|
Tobacco | 0.38 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.33 |
0.32
|
Cattle | 2.81 | 3.00 | 2.55 | 2.69 | 2.68 | 2.49 |
2.70
|
Hogs | 2.51 | 2.31 | 2.00 | 2.09 | 2.39 | 2.29 |
2.27
|
Sheep | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.13 |
0.14
|
Dairy | 4.55 | 4.4 | 4.45 | 4.33 | 4.29 | 4.17 |
4.37
|
Poultry & Eggs | 2.76 | 2.91 | 2.92 | 2.76 | 2.84 | 2.9 |
2.85
|
Honey | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
0.03
|
Other Domestic | 1.04 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.13 | 0.94 | 1.07 |
1.03
|
Total Domestic | 27.19 | 27.77 | 27.31 | 27.74 | 27.65 | 27.57 |
27.54
|
Other Sourcing | 3.74 | 3.96 | 3.73 | 3.69 | 3.91 | 4.08 |
3.85
|
Beverages | 2.34 | 2.21 | 2.14 | 2.07 | 1.98 | 2.13 |
2.15
|
Total | 33.27 | 33.94 | 33.18 | 33.51 | 33.54 | 33.78 |
33.54
|
*Adapted from James, Staciwa and Duff. 2013. A Statistic for Ontario
Agri-Food Contribution by Primary Sector.
OMAFRA.
Table 3. Ontario Agriculture, Total Employment from Primary, Processing and Retail by Commodity, Adjusted for Product Imports (# of jobs)*
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 6 Yr. Avg. | |
Grains & Oilseed |
115,974
|
133,727
|
132,515
|
141,444
|
145,035
|
164,257
|
138,825
|
Potato |
4,713
|
5,804
|
6,176
|
5,990
|
5,065
|
4,880
|
5,438
|
Greenhouse Vegetables |
37,621
|
36,329
|
41,113
|
43,209
|
41,390
|
39,728
|
39,898
|
Field Vegetables |
31,699
|
30,221
|
30,259
|
29,475
|
28,122
|
29,666
|
29,907
|
Fruits |
16,499
|
17,655
|
16,131
|
13,284
|
13,974
|
10,605
|
14,691
|
Nursery & Floriculture |
52,944
|
44,799
|
49,718
|
45,885
|
42,302
|
42,371
|
46,337
|
Maple |
1,033
|
1,318
|
2,256
|
1,480
|
2,726
|
1,002
|
1,636
|
Tobacco |
4,570
|
3,759
|
4,209
|
4,664
|
6,092
|
4,927
|
4,704
|
Cattle |
62,650
|
66,862
|
58,784
|
59,869
|
61,207
|
56,908
|
61,047
|
Hogs |
52,203
|
49,107
|
43,241
|
43,828
|
49,693
|
47,011
|
47,514
|
Sheep |
4,645
|
4,213
|
4,356
|
4,752
|
4,364
|
4,081
|
4,402
|
Dairy |
110,311
|
104,027
|
109,793
|
106,289
|
108,844
|
107,231
|
107,749
|
Poultry & Eggs |
62,588
|
65,936
|
65,466
|
60,968
|
63,351
|
64,984
|
63,882
|
Honey |
1,496
|
1,353
|
1,755
|
2,240
|
2,285
|
2,630
|
1,960
|
Other Domestic |
38,186
|
42,192
|
41,149
|
39,489
|
35,621
|
41,926
|
39,761
|
Total Domestic |
597,135
|
607,303
|
606,921
|
602,867
|
610,070
|
622,207
|
607,751
|
Other Sourcing |
94,010
|
101,440
|
98,389
|
93,020
|
96,900
|
105,326
|
98,181
|
Beverages |
10,151
|
10,204
|
10,587
|
10,670
|
10,419
|
12,198
|
10,705
|
Total |
701,295
|
718,948
|
715,897
|
706,556
|
717,389
|
739,731
|
716,636
|
*Adapted from James, Staciwa and Duff. 2013. A Statistic for Ontario
Agri-Food Contribution by Primary Sector.
OMAFRA
Table 4. Ontario Agriculture, Comparative Measures of Economic Output by Commodity for 2011, Adjusted for Imports*
Revenue ($Cdn billion)
|
GDP ($Cdn billion)
|
Employment
|
|||||||
Primary
|
Processing
|
Retail
|
Primary
|
Processing
|
Retail
|
Primary
|
Processing
|
Retail
|
|
Grains & Oilseed |
2.79
|
9.14
|
24.34
|
1.28
|
2.9
|
3.96
|
3,333
|
28,130
|
113,573
|
Potato |
0.10
|
0.21
|
0.84
|
0.04
|
0.07
|
0.14
|
341
|
773
|
3,950
|
Greenhouse Vegetables |
0.70
|
1.47
|
6.11
|
0.39
|
0.49
|
1
|
7,228
|
5,606
|
28,556
|
Field Vegetables |
0.54
|
1.15
|
4.69
|
0.25
|
0.37
|
0.76
|
1,898
|
4,303
|
21,920
|
Fruits |
0.22
|
0.48
|
1.9
|
0.1
|
0.15
|
0.31
|
3,351
|
1,743
|
8,880
|
Nursery & Floriculture |
0.81
|
0.4
|
7.03
|
0.45
|
0.12
|
1.15
|
8,315
|
1,112
|
32,875
|
Maple |
0.03
|
0.01
|
0.28
|
0.01
|
0
|
0.05
|
1,367
|
45
|
1,315
|
Tobacco |
0.11
|
0.43
|
0.05
|
0.27
|
-
|
4,686
|
1,406
|
-
|
|
Cattle |
1.01
|
3.26
|
8.94
|
0.25
|
0.9
|
1.54
|
11,066
|
7,999
|
42,142
|
Hogs |
0.94
|
2.95
|
8.17
|
0.23
|
0.83
|
1.33
|
4,242
|
7,408
|
38,043
|
Sheep |
0.06
|
0.19
|
0.52
|
0.01
|
0.05
|
0.08
|
1,460
|
472
|
2,432
|
Dairy |
1.90
|
5.43
|
16.55
|
0.47
|
1.13
|
2.7
|
20,760
|
10,788
|
77,296
|
Poultry & Eggs |
1.20
|
3.02
|
10.48
|
0.3
|
0.84
|
1.71
|
6,909
|
7,535
|
48,908
|
Honey |
0.02
|
0.01
|
0.19
|
0.01
|
0
|
0.03
|
1,349
|
31
|
905
|
Other Domestic |
0.48
|
0.23
|
4.19
|
0.22
|
0.07
|
0.65
|
15,794
|
662
|
19,165
|
Other Sourcing |
2.77
|
18.3
|
-
|
0.82
|
3.1
|
-
|
5,582
|
91,318
|
|
Beverages |
3.96
|
-
|
1.98
|
-
|
-
|
10,419
|
-
|
||
Total |
10.90
|
35.11
|
112.55
|
4.06
|
10.99
|
18.49
|
92,100
|
94,013
|
531,276
|
*Adapted from James, Staciwa and Duff. 2013. A Statistic for Ontario
Agri-Food Contribution by Primary Sector. OMAFRA
References
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/welcome.html
For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca
Author: | Tom Hamilton - Beef Cattle Production Systems Program Lead, OMAFRA |
---|---|
Creation Date: | 21 July 2014 |
Last Reviewed: | 21 July 2014 |